Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has revolutionized the way users interact with financial services, and at the heart of many DeFi protocols lies the governance token—a digital asset that grants holders voting rights and, in some cases, a share of protocol revenue. While governance tokens were initially celebrated for enabling community-led decision-making, their real-world utility varies widely. Some distribute significant value to token holders, while others offer little beyond symbolic influence.
In this analysis, we explore how leading DeFi protocols generate income and whether their governance tokens effectively capture value for holders. We’ll examine key players like Uniswap, Convex Finance, Lido Finance, dYdX, Synthetix, and ENS, diving into their revenue models, distribution mechanisms, and implications for long-term token sustainability.
Uniswap: Dominating DEX Market Share Without Rewarding UNI Holders
Uniswap remains the most widely used decentralized exchange (DEX), commanding approximately 70% market share in on-chain trading volume. As of early July 2025, it generated around $969 million in fees over seven days, primarily from trading activity across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism.
👉 Discover how top DeFi platforms are redefining value capture for token holders.
The fee structure evolved with Uniswap V3, which introduced customizable fee tiers (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.3%, and 1%) depending on the liquidity pool. Despite its dominance, UNI governance tokens do not capture any direct protocol revenue. All trading fees go entirely to liquidity providers.
This has sparked growing debate within the community. Critics argue that the protocol treasury—which holds substantial reserves—could implement a "fee switch" to redirect a portion of fees to the DAO or UNI stakers. Former The Block researcher mhonkasalo recently proposed activating this mechanism selectively in high-volume pools to begin capturing value for token holders.
While Uniswap Labs still wields considerable influence over development, full decentralization remains an aspirational goal. Until then, UNI serves more as a governance instrument than a value-accruing asset.
Convex Finance: Rewarding CVX Stakers with Protocol Revenue
Convex Finance emerged as a dominant force among yield aggregators by optimizing returns on Curve Finance (CRV) staking. With a total value locked (TVL) of **$4.35 billion**, compared to Yearn Finance’s $530 million, Convex demonstrates superior capital efficiency.
Over the same seven-day period, Convex generated $5.5 million in protocol revenue from boosted yields on user deposits. Unlike Uniswap, Convex shares a portion of its earnings with stakeholders:
17% of revenue is retained by the protocol.
- 10% goes to cvxCRV stakers.
- 5% to CVX stakers and lockers.
- 1% as an additional incentive for CVX lockers.
- 1% covers operational costs.
This means 6% of total protocol income flows directly to CVX holders, creating tangible economic alignment. By locking CVX, users gain boosted rewards and voting power, reinforcing long-term commitment.
Convex exemplifies a sustainable model where governance token holders benefit not just from price appreciation but from real cash flow distribution.
Lido Finance: Distributing Staking Rewards Across Stakeholders
As the largest liquid staking protocol, Lido supports Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, and other chains with a combined TVL of $5.36 billion. It enables users to stake assets like ETH without locking up liquidity, issuing derivative tokens (e.g., stETH) in return.
Lido generated $3.8 million in weekly revenue from staking yields. Its revenue distribution model is transparent and balanced:
- 90% to staking users.
- 5% to node operators.
- 5% to the Lido DAO treasury.
While only a small fraction reaches token holders directly, the DAO can propose using treasury funds for buybacks, incentives, or ecosystem grants. This indirect value capture gives LDO token holders influence over how surplus revenue is deployed.
Moreover, Lido’s governance controls critical parameters like node operator selection and fee adjustments, ensuring community oversight over one of crypto’s most capital-intensive services.
dYdX: High Revenue, No Rewards for DYDX Holders
dYdX operates a high-performance perpetual futures exchange built on Ethereum Layer 2 (currently migrating to its own appchain). It reported **$3.6 million in weekly fees**, drawn from a 24-hour trading volume of $822 million and $303 million in open interest.
Despite allocating 50% of DYDX tokens to the community, the protocol currently retains all trading fees under centralized management. There are no plans yet to distribute revenue to token holders.
Users can stake DYDX for fee discounts and participate in trading incentives ("trading mining"), but these don’t equate to passive income. The upcoming v4 upgrade aims to transition toward full decentralization and may introduce fee-sharing mechanisms—though details remain unclear.
For now, DYDX functions more as an access or discount token than a value-bearing asset, raising questions about long-term holder incentives.
Synthetix: Full Revenue Distribution to SNX Stakers
Synthetix stands out as one of the few protocols that distributes 100% of its revenue to token holders. As a synthetic asset platform, it enables the creation and trading of derivatives tied to cryptocurrencies, forex, indices, and commodities.
With weekly income reaching $2.68 million, fees come from:
- Synth minting and burning.
- Liquidation penalties.
- Exchange spreads on Kwenta (its DEX) and Lyra (options protocol).
All fees are paid out in sUSD, a USD-pegged stablecoin, directly to SNX stakers who collateralize the system. Additionally, inflationary SNX rewards are issued, though they’re subject to a one-year vesting period.
This full revenue-sharing model creates strong alignment between protocol success and staker returns, making SNX one of the most economically empowering governance tokens in DeFi.
👉 See how next-gen DeFi protocols are rewarding users through innovative tokenomics.
ENS: Revenue Accumulates, But Not Shared with Token Holders
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) simplifies blockchain addresses by mapping human-readable names (e.g., alice.eth) to wallet addresses. It earned **$2.23 million in seven days**, mostly from new domain registrations at $5 per year for names longer than five characters.
Gas fees previously deterred mass adoption, but lower network congestion in 2025 has driven a surge in new sign-ups.
Although ENS has accumulated significant treasury value and achieved operational sustainability since 2020, it does not distribute revenue to .ETH domain owners or ENS token holders. Funds remain under DAO control for future development and grants.
There is ongoing discussion about introducing yield-sharing or rebates for registrants, but no formal proposal has passed.
Key Takeaways: What Defines a Valuable Governance Token?
| Service Type | Example Protocols | Revenue Share with Token Holders |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediary Platforms | Uniswap, Aave, Compound | Low or none |
| Full-Service Protocols | Synthetix, Convex | High (direct distribution) |
| Infrastructure Providers | Lido, ENS | Partial or indirect |
Core Keywords: DeFi governance tokens, protocol revenue distribution, UNI tokenomics, SNX staking rewards, CVX yield sharing, Lido DAO, ENS revenue model, dYdX fee structure
A valuable governance token should do more than grant voting rights—it should provide economic benefits tied to protocol performance. As shown above:
- Protocols relying on user-supplied capital (like DEXs or lending platforms) often prioritize liquidity providers over token holders.
- Projects offering end-to-end services (like Synthetix or Convex) are better positioned to share profits directly.
- Even when revenue is captured (as with ENS or dYdX), distribution lags behind due to governance inertia or centralization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can governance tokens generate passive income?
A: Yes—but only if the protocol distributes revenue to stakers or implements buybacks. Examples include SNX and CVX; UNI does not currently offer this.
Q: Why doesn’t Uniswap share fees with UNI holders?
A: Uniswap was designed to incentivize liquidity providers first. Activating the “fee switch” would require a governance vote and is still under discussion.
Q: How does Synthetix afford to pay out all fees?
A: SNX stakers act as underwriters, taking on systemic risk by locking collateral. In return, they earn all trading and minting fees as compensation.
Q: Is staking governance tokens always profitable?
A: Not necessarily. Profitability depends on inflation rates, fee distribution policies, and market conditions. Always assess risk vs reward.
Q: Will dYdX start sharing revenue in the future?
A: The v4 upgrade roadmap includes potential fee-sharing mechanisms, but no guarantees have been made yet.
Q: Does ENS plan to distribute income to users?
A: There are active discussions within the DAO about reward programs, but no official distribution plan exists today.