Bitcoin forks are a foundational concept in blockchain evolution, reflecting both technical innovation and community-driven divergence. Whether you're new to cryptocurrencies or expanding your knowledge, understanding the mechanics behind hard forks, soft forks, and code forks is essential. This guide breaks down each type with clarity, explores notable examples, and examines whether Bitcoin forks still hold relevance in 2025 and beyond.
What Is a Bitcoin Fork?
A fork in Bitcoin refers to a change in the blockchain’s protocol or software — not a dinner utensil, but a software development term meaning the creation of a new branch from an existing codebase. In blockchain, this can lead to upgrades, disputes, or entirely new cryptocurrencies.
Forks occur either accidentally — due to bugs or network latency — or intentionally, driven by developers or community consensus. Accidental splits typically resolve quickly, leaving behind orphaned blocks. Intentional forks, however, can permanently split the network and create lasting impacts.
👉 Discover how blockchain upgrades shape digital asset ecosystems.
There are three primary types of Bitcoin forks:
- Code forks (project forks): New cryptocurrencies built using Bitcoin’s open-source code.
- Soft forks: Backwards-compatible updates that don’t split the chain.
- Hard forks: Non-backwards-compatible changes that may result in a new blockchain.
Understanding these distinctions helps clarify why some forks fade into obscurity while others become major players in the crypto space.
Code Forks: Building on Bitcoin’s Foundation
Bitcoin’s open-source nature allows developers to reuse its code for new projects. These are known as code forks or project forks. Unlike chain splits, they don’t share transaction history with Bitcoin.
Examples include:
- Litecoin (LTC): Uses Scrypt instead of SHA-256 for mining.
- Dash: Focuses on privacy and instant transactions.
- Groestlcoin: Optimized for fast block times.
These are independent networks from inception. When someone says “Litecoin is a fork of Bitcoin,” they mean it inherits architectural principles, not ledger history.
Soft Forks: Seamless Upgrades Without Splits
A soft fork is a protocol upgrade that remains compatible with older software versions. Nodes running outdated software can still validate transactions, though they may not support new features.
Notable Bitcoin soft forks:
- SegWit (Segregated Witness): Separated signature data from transaction data to increase block capacity and fix transaction malleability.
- Taproot: Enhanced privacy and smart contract capabilities through Schnorr signatures and script improvements.
Soft forks require miner support but don’t force a network split. They represent consensus-driven progress — evolutionary, not revolutionary.
Hard Forks: When the Chain Splits
A hard fork introduces rules incompatible with previous versions. All participants must upgrade their software; otherwise, they risk following an obsolete chain.
Hard forks often stem from ideological disagreements within the community. If enough nodes adopt the new rules, a permanent split occurs, creating two separate blockchains.
Two outcomes are possible:
- One chain dominates; the other fades.
- Both chains survive with distinct communities and use cases (e.g., Bitcoin Cash).
Hard forks can also rewrite history — such as reversing hacks — which raises philosophical questions about immutability.
Notable Bitcoin Hard Forks
While many Bitcoin forks have come and gone, several stand out due to market impact, technical innovation, or community controversy.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) – August 1, 2017
Key Change: Block size increased from 1 MB to 8 MB (later raised further).
Bitcoin Cash emerged from a long-standing debate over scalability. The Bitcoin Core team favored SegWit to optimize block space without increasing size. A faction argued that larger blocks were the true path to peer-to-peer electronic cash.
BCH supporters believed bigger blocks would lower fees and increase throughput. While it achieved higher transaction volumes at lower costs, adoption remained limited compared to BTC.
Despite initial hype, BCH has seen declining usage relative to its peak. However, it remains one of the most recognized hard forks.
Bitcoin SV (BSV) – November 15, 2017
Key Change: Removed block size limits entirely; now supports massive blocks.
Bitcoin SV ("Satoshi Vision") split from Bitcoin Cash, not Bitcoin directly. Its proponents claim adherence to Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision — particularly unlimited block sizes for enterprise-scale applications.
BSV enables smart contracts and tokenization via expanded scripting. However, centralization concerns persist due to reliance on professional mining operations.
The project was heavily associated with Craig Wright, who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto. After legal defeats in 2024 over this claim, BSV rebranded to BSV Blockchain, distancing itself from past controversies.
Bitcoin Gold (BTG) – October 24, 2017
Key Change: Switched mining algorithm from SHA-256 to Zhash to resist ASIC dominance.
Bitcoin Gold aimed to democratize mining by making it accessible to GPU users. By changing the proof-of-work mechanism, it sought to reduce centralization caused by specialized hardware.
However, without sufficient miner support or ecosystem development, BTG struggled to maintain value or security. It suffered multiple 51% attacks and lost most of its market relevance.
👉 Learn how mining dynamics influence blockchain decentralization.
Other BTC Forks: From eCash to Forgotten Chains
Several lesser-known forks emerged during the 2017 boom:
- eCash (XEC): Formerly BCH ABC, introduced developer funding mechanisms and post-consensus models like Avalanche.
- Bitcoin Diamond (BCD): Increased supply and premined tokens.
- Super Bitcoin: Added account-based balances and premining.
Most failed due to lack of sustained community support or perceived value addition.
How Communities Handle Forks
Forks often reflect deep ideological divides. The effects ripple across users, developers, and investors differently.
- Users receive free coins post-fork (like an unexpected airdrop), but managing multiple assets can be confusing.
- Developers face fragmentation; supporting multiple chains dilutes resources.
- Investors may profit short-term from volatility but worry about long-term reputational damage to Bitcoin.
Chain splits also test network resilience. While hard forks enable innovation, frequent splits risk eroding trust in Bitcoin’s stability.
Can You Create Your Own Bitcoin Fork?
Technically, yes — but success depends on more than code.
To create a viable fork:
- Fork the Bitcoin repository (e.g., Bitcoin Core on GitHub).
- Modify parameters (block size, consensus rules, etc.).
- Launch at a specific block height.
- Gain node and miner support.
Without adoption, your fork becomes another abandoned chain. Real-world viability requires solving actual problems — not just copying code.
👉 Explore tools that help analyze blockchain network health and activity.
Do Bitcoin Forks Have a Future?
In 2025, debate continues over Bitcoin’s direction — particularly around data bloat from inscriptions like Runes and NFTs on-chain.
Some developers advocate for spam filters to preserve Bitcoin’s role as digital money. Others argue this compromises neutrality. A growing number of nodes now run Bitcoin Knots, an alternative client that resists enforced filtering — signaling potential tension ahead.
With over 13% of nodes using non-Core software and rising, could another hard fork emerge? While unlikely today, it's no longer unthinkable.
Moreover, as institutions invest billions into Bitcoin, any future split could have far-reaching financial consequences. Community governance may evolve toward more formal structures to prevent destabilizing conflicts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a hard fork and a soft fork?
A soft fork is backwards-compatible and doesn’t split the chain; a hard fork introduces incompatible changes that can result in two separate blockchains.
Does every Bitcoin fork create a new cryptocurrency?
No. Only hard forks that result in sustained network support create new coins. Accidental splits or abandoned forks do not.
Do I get free coins during a Bitcoin hard fork?
Yes — if you held BTC at the time of the fork, you usually receive an equal amount of the new coin (e.g., BCH). However, value often drops rapidly after distribution.
Why did Bitcoin Cash split from Bitcoin?
Due to disagreement over scaling: larger blocks (BCH) vs. SegWit optimization (BTC).
Is Litecoin a hard fork of Bitcoin?
No. Litecoin is a code fork — built using modified Bitcoin code but launched as a separate network with no shared history.
Are hard forks dangerous for blockchain security?
They can weaken security if hashing power is divided. Smaller chains are more vulnerable to attacks like 51% takeovers.
Keywords: Bitcoin fork, hard fork vs soft fork, code fork, blockchain split, SegWit, Taproot, Bitcoin Cash, BSV