The crypto markets have experienced a prolonged downturn since the late 2017 and early 2018 peaks. While headlines scream about collapsing prices, a closer look reveals a different story beneath the surface. Despite steep declines in Bitcoin and Ethereum valuations, their underlying network fundamentals have held up far better — suggesting that current prices may not fully reflect the health and utility of these leading blockchains.
This analysis compares the network value of Bitcoin and Ethereum with key demand- and supply-side metrics over time. By examining real usage data, we can assess whether the market’s bearish sentiment is justified — or if we’re witnessing an overcorrection disconnected from reality.
👉 Discover how blockchain fundamentals are defying market trends
Understanding Network Value vs. Fundamentals
To evaluate whether price movements align with actual network performance, we use network value — calculated as price per unit multiplied by total circulating supply. This metric captures the total market capitalization of a cryptocurrency at any given time.
On the other hand, fundamentals reflect the real-world usage and infrastructure strength of a blockchain. These include:
- Demand-side indicators: Transaction volume, transaction value, unique addresses, gas usage (for Ethereum)
- Supply-side indicators: Hash rate, node count, miner activity, developer engagement
When price drops significantly but usage remains stable or declines only slightly, it suggests that the network is being undervalued.
The data analyzed here spans from:
- Bitcoin: December 17, 2017 (peak network value)
- Ethereum: January 13, 2018 (peak network value)
All data is sourced from trusted on-chain analytics platforms such as Blockchain.info and Etherscan.
Demand-Side Analysis: Transaction Activity
Daily Transactions
Bitcoin currently processes around 250,000 daily transactions, while Ethereum handles approximately 500,000. Although both are below their all-time highs, they’ve stabilized in recent months — even showing signs of gradual recovery.
From peak values:
- Bitcoin’s network value is down 81%
- Ethereum’s network value is down 93%
However, transaction volumes tell a different story:
- Bitcoin’s daily transactions are only down 41%
- Ethereum’s are down 52%
This divergence indicates sustained user activity despite price collapse.
Using a simplified application of Metcalfe’s Law — which posits that a network’s value scales with the square of its users — we can estimate a “proxy value” based on remaining transaction activity.
- For Bitcoin: 59% of transaction activity remains → proxy value = 0.59² = 0.35 → implies a justified drawdown of 65%, not 81%
- For Ethereum: 48% remains → 0.48² = 0.23 → implies a justified drawdown of 77%, not 93%
👉 See how network activity supports long-term crypto value
Thus, both networks appear undervalued relative to transaction-based fundamentals.
Native Functionality: What Each Chain Was Built to Do
Each blockchain serves a distinct purpose. Evaluating their core functions provides deeper insight into true demand.
Bitcoin: Secure Value Transfer
Bitcoin's primary function is to move value securely across borders. The estimated daily transaction value consistently exceeds $1 billion, even during bear markets.
Since the peak:
- Network value down 81%
- Daily transaction value down only 74%
Applying Metcalfe’s Law:
- 26% of activity remains → 0.26² = 0.07 → implies a justified drawdown of 93%
In this case, price action nearly aligns with fundamentals — one of the few metrics where market reaction seems proportionate.
Ethereum: Smart Contract Execution
Ethereum's native function is executing smart contracts, measured by total daily gas used.
Surprisingly:
- Network value down 93%
- Gas usage down only 7%
Yes — over 90% of Ethereum’s computational demand remains intact.
Proxy value calculation:
- 93% activity remains → 0.93² = 0.87 → implies only a 13% drawdown is justified
This staggering gap reveals that Ethereum’s utility has barely weakened, yet its valuation has collapsed nearly entirely.
User Engagement: Unique Addresses
Another way to measure demand is through daily unique addresses used, a proxy for active users.
For Bitcoin:
- Down 51% from peak
- Remaining activity: 49%
- Proxy value: 0.49² = 0.24 → implies a justified drawdown of 76%
Again, actual price decline (81%) exceeds what usage patterns suggest — reinforcing the idea that Bitcoin is undervalued.
(Ethereum data on unique addresses is less reliable due to contract interactions, but gas usage already confirms strong ongoing demand.)
Supply-Side Strength: Hash Rate Resilience
The health of a proof-of-work blockchain also depends on its mining ecosystem, best measured by hash rate — the total computational power securing the network.
Here’s the surprise:
Both Bitcoin and Ethereum now have higher hash rates than at their price peaks.
While hash rate typically lags price and may eventually decline if conditions worsen, current levels show miners remain committed. This resilience reflects confidence in long-term viability and continued profitability (even with lower prices).
Additional supply-side factors worth monitoring:
- Number of full nodes
- Miner revenue (block rewards + fees)
- Developer contributions
Internal research from firms like Placeholder indicates that developer activity remains robust, further supporting network fundamentals.
Why This Disconnect Matters
Most traditional asset classes have standardized valuation models — analysts debate inputs, not frameworks. In crypto, however, there's no consensus on how to value networks, leading to extreme volatility and emotional pricing.
As Chris Burniske noted:
"Theory follows price, price follows theory."
Right now, Mr. Market seems to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater. He’s reacting to sentiment rather than fundamentals.
But as data becomes more accessible through platforms like CoinMetrics, CryptoCompare, and Etherscan, analytical rigor will increase. Over time, this should lead to more rational pricing — and greater alignment between value and price.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is network value?
A: Network value (or market cap) is calculated by multiplying the current price of a cryptocurrency by its circulating supply. It represents the total market valuation of the asset.
Q: Why use Metcalfe’s Law for crypto valuation?
A: Metcalfe’s Law suggests that a network’s value grows proportionally to the square of its number of users. It’s been applied to social networks and telecom systems — and increasingly used as a rough model for blockchain networks where utility increases with adoption.
Q: Is hash rate really a reliable indicator?
A: Yes — hash rate reflects the security and decentralization strength of a proof-of-work blockchain. Higher hash rate means more miners are participating, making attacks harder and showing continued investment in infrastructure.
Q: How can Ethereum’s gas usage stay so high during a bear market?
A: Because real applications run on Ethereum — DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, DAOs, and more. Usage isn’t driven solely by speculation; many users rely on Ethereum for functional services regardless of price.
Q: Does this mean Bitcoin and Ethereum are undervalued?
A: Based on fundamental metrics like transaction volume, economic activity, and network security, both appear significantly undervalued compared to their utility and adoption levels — especially Ethereum.
Q: Where can I access this kind of blockchain data?
A: Public explorers like Blockchain.info (Bitcoin), Etherscan (Ethereum), along with analytics platforms like Glassnode, CoinGecko, and CryptoCompare provide transparent access to on-chain metrics.
Final Thoughts
While prices for Bitcoin and Ethereum have plummeted since their peaks, their core functionalities remain strong. Transaction volumes are resilient, smart contract usage is thriving (especially on Ethereum), and network security has improved.
The data clearly shows that fundamentals are declining far less than prices — indicating potential long-term undervaluation.
As institutional understanding grows and better tools emerge for analyzing blockchain data, markets will likely correct this imbalance. Until then, patient investors may find opportunity in the disconnect between perception and reality.
👉 Explore blockchain data and track real crypto fundamentals today