The world of digital finance is evolving rapidly, and Hong Kong is positioning itself at the forefront of virtual asset innovation—while maintaining a careful balance between fostering growth and protecting investors. In a keynote address at Hong Kong FinTech Week titled “FinTech: The Transformation of the Financial Industry,” Ms. Julia Leung Fung-yee, Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Intermediaries at the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), shared critical updates on Hong Kong’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies and virtual assets.
As technology reshapes financial services, from online investment platforms to blockchain-based trading, regulators must adapt. The SFC has taken a proactive yet measured path, responding to market developments without stifling innovation. This article explores the progression of Hong Kong’s crypto regulations, recent policy shifts, and what they mean for institutional players and retail investors alike.
A Strategic Shift in Virtual Asset Oversight
When cryptocurrencies first emerged, many global regulators—including the SFC—approached them with caution. In 2017, amid growing interest in initial coin offerings (ICOs), the SFC recognized the need to evaluate whether these digital instruments should fall under existing securities laws.
At that time, concerns were twofold:
- Granting regulatory legitimacy might inflate the perceived value of inherently volatile or speculative assets.
- Overregulation could stifle technological innovation in a nascent industry.
However, the risks of inaction soon became apparent. Unregulated platforms posed serious threats related to money laundering, terrorist financing, and investor protection, especially due to anonymous transactions, weak cybersecurity, and potential market manipulation.
👉 Discover how compliant crypto platforms are shaping the future of finance.
This led to a pivotal shift in 2018.
The 2018 Regulatory Framework: A Targeted Approach
In 2018, the SFC introduced a “selective licensing” regime through its Statement on Regulatory Framework for Virtual Asset Portfolio Managers, Fund Distributors, and Platform Operators. This framework applied to three key areas:
- Fund managers investing 10% or more of their portfolios in virtual assets
- Distributors marketing crypto-related funds
- Virtual asset trading platforms dealing in tokens classified as securities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO)
Under this model, only professional investors—as defined under the SFO—could access such services. The term “selective” reflects that regulation kicks in only when virtual assets meet the legal definition of securities or when regulated activities (like trading or advising) are involved.
This wasn’t blanket oversight but a risk-based strategy designed to protect the financial system while allowing innovation room to grow.
Strengthening Exchange Oversight: The 2019 Position Paper
Building on the 2018 framework, the SFC released its Position Paper on the Regulation of Virtual Asset Trading Platforms in November 2019. This formalized stricter rules for crypto exchanges, aligning them with standards applied to traditional securities brokers and automated trading systems.
Key requirements included:
- Custody and asset protection: Robust safeguards for client funds and private keys
- KYC and AML compliance: Strict identity verification and anti-money laundering protocols
- Market integrity: Measures to prevent insider trading and price manipulation
- Cybersecurity standards: Mandatory risk assessments and incident reporting
- Risk management frameworks: Comprehensive operational controls
Importantly, even under this enhanced regime, only professional investors could trade on licensed platforms—keeping retail participation at bay for now.
To date, the SFC has granted a full license to just one platform: OSL Digital Securities Limited. However, several other applications are under active review, signaling growing institutional interest in compliant crypto operations.
Global Influences Shaping Local Policy
Hong Kong’s regulatory evolution hasn’t occurred in isolation. International developments have played a major role.
FATF’s Impact on Licensing Requirements
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) revised its guidelines in 2018, urging jurisdictions to license or register Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and subject them to full AML/CFT obligations. In response, Hong Kong plans to extend its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance to cover all centralized virtual asset platforms—even those trading non-security tokens.
This upcoming regime will require all such platforms to obtain SFC licenses and comply with stringent reporting and compliance duties.
IOSCO’s Guidance on Exchange Regulation
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has also published recommendations for regulating crypto asset trading platforms. These focus on market transparency, custody practices, and investor disclosure—principles the SFC has already integrated into its own framework.
Regulatory Thinking on Stablecoins
In response to proposals like Diem (formerly Libra), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and IOSCO jointly recommended treating stablecoins as financial market infrastructure. They urged jurisdictions to assess their systemic importance and apply proportionate oversight.
These global trends reinforce the SFC’s core principle: “Same business, same risk, same rules.”
Expanding Access: Should Retail Investors Be Allowed In?
One of the most pressing questions today is whether retail investors should be permitted to access crypto investment products—particularly crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) traded on traditional exchanges abroad.
Products like Bitcoin ETFs are already available in markets such as Canada (via the Toronto Stock Exchange), and some Hong Kong-based financial institutions have approached the SFC about distributing them to private banking clients or professional investors.
But this raises complex regulatory challenges:
- What happens if a platform offering crypto access is unregulated or lightly supervised?
- Can licensed intermediaries act as introducing agents without assuming full responsibility?
- Should firms assess a client’s crypto knowledge before offering these products?
- Do current investor protection rules go far enough?
👉 See how regulated crypto investment channels can empower informed decision-making.
The SFC is currently reviewing its entire virtual asset regime to answer these questions. The goal remains clear: create a transparent, secure environment where innovation thrives alongside strong investor safeguards.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can retail investors currently trade cryptocurrencies on SFC-licensed platforms in Hong Kong?
A: No. As of now, only professional investors are allowed to trade on SFC-licensed virtual asset platforms. The SFC is evaluating whether to allow retail access in the future, possibly with additional safeguards.
Q: Are crypto ETFs available in Hong Kong?
A: Not yet directly. While crypto ETFs are listed overseas (e.g., in Canada), Hong Kong has not approved local listings. However, some institutions may distribute foreign ETFs under existing fund distribution rules—subject to ongoing regulatory review.
Q: How does Hong Kong regulate stablecoins?
A: There is no standalone stablecoin regulation yet. However, if a stablecoin qualifies as a security or operates as part of a payment system, it may fall under existing SFC or HKMA oversight. Broader rules may emerge following international guidance.
Q: Is it legal to operate an unlicensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong?
A: No. Under proposed amendments, all centralized virtual asset trading platforms must be licensed by the SFC and comply with AML/CFT requirements—even if they deal in non-security tokens.
Q: What defines a “professional investor” in Hong Kong?
A: Individuals with portfolios exceeding HK$8 million or corporations with at least HK$40 million in investments qualify as professional investors under the Securities and Futures (Professional Investor) Rules.
Q: How many crypto exchanges are licensed by the SFC?
A: Only one—OSL Digital Securities Limited—has received a full license so far. Others are in various stages of application and review.
Looking Ahead: Innovation Meets Responsibility
The SFC’s journey reflects a thoughtful evolution—from cautious observation to targeted regulation, and now toward potential retail inclusion. With virtual assets becoming increasingly integrated into mainstream finance, the commission is re-evaluating its frameworks to ensure they remain fit for purpose.
Core keywords guiding this transformation include: Hong Kong crypto regulation, SFC virtual assets, crypto ETFs, licensed crypto exchange, retail investor access, FATF VASP rules, stablecoin regulation, and professional investor criteria.
As the consultation continues, one thing is certain: Hong Kong aims to be a leader in responsible digital finance—one where innovation doesn’t come at the cost of trust.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory changes with insights from a global crypto leader.