Introduction
In the fast-evolving world of decentralized finance (DeFi), investors face a critical question: How should I allocate my capital for maximum returns? Three dominant strategies have emerged: holding ETH, actively buying and selling governance tokens, and liquidity mining.
This analysis evaluates the performance of these strategies between June 1 and October 1, 2020—a pivotal period when DeFi captured global attention and billions of dollars flowed into Ethereum-based protocols. While liquidity mining generated headlines with eye-popping yields, our findings suggest that a disciplined, trend-based approach to trading governance tokens delivered superior risk-adjusted returns, especially for retail investors.
By examining real data from SEBA Research, Coingecko, and DeBank, we uncover not only which strategy performed best but also why—factoring in network fees, timing precision, and investor behavior.
👉 Discover how smart DeFi strategies can boost your returns in volatile markets.
The Three Core DeFi Investment Strategies
1. Holding ETH (HODL Strategy)
The simplest and most passive approach is holding Ether (ETH) over time. This strategy serves as a benchmark for evaluating more active methods. During the analyzed period (June–October 2020), ETH appreciated moderately, reflecting steady adoption but lacking explosive growth.
While holding ETH avoids transaction costs and decision fatigue, it also misses out on alpha opportunities created by new token launches, airdrops, and market momentum shifts within the DeFi ecosystem.
2. Liquidity Mining (Yield Farming)
Liquidity mining involves depositing assets—like ETH or stablecoins—into decentralized exchanges (DEXs) or lending platforms to earn rewards in the form of governance tokens. Protocols such as Balancer (BAL), Compound (COMP), and Yearn Finance (YFI) pioneered this model, incentivizing users to provide liquidity.
However, this strategy demands high engagement:
- Frequent movement between protocols to chase the highest yields.
- Deep understanding of impermanent loss, smart contract risks, and gas optimization.
- Significant capital to offset Ethereum’s soaring transaction fees.
For small investors, known as “small farmers,” high gas fees made frequent swaps economically unviable—turning yield farming into a game dominated by well-capitalized players.
3. Buying and Selling Governance Tokens
This active strategy revolves around trading DeFi governance tokens such as YFI, UNI, SUSHI, and CRV. We break it down into three sub-approaches:
A. Rule-Based Trading
A quantitative method: buy when price exceeds a 50% threshold above recent lows; sell when it drops 30% from its peak. This systematic approach yielded 1978% return on a $1,000 investment—driven largely by YFI’s meteoric rise from near-zero to over $40,000.
B. DeFi Degens ("Degenerate Traders")
High-risk traders who chase hype without due diligence. Many jumped into projects like YAM, which collapsed within 24 hours from $138 to near zero. Despite UNI’s airdrop giving them a temporary boost, their overall return was just 66%.
C. Trend-Based Investing
Balances discipline with market awareness. Investors monitor social sentiment (e.g., Twitter trends), protocol updates, and macro signals to enter and exit positions. This method achieved a 365% return, striking an optimal balance between risk and reward.
Among these, trend-based trading proved most sustainable and accessible for average investors.
Performance Comparison: Trend-Based Trading vs. Holding ETH
Let’s compare two $1,000 portfolios:
| Strategy | Final Value | Profit | Outperformance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holding ETH | $1,548 | $548 | Baseline |
| Trend-Based Trading | $4,648 | $3,648 | +310% |
Even after accounting for Uniswap swap fees for ERC-20 token trades, the active strategy significantly outperformed passive holding. Notably, the inclusion of the UNI airdrop added substantial value—but even without it, the gap remained significant (~$1,661 difference).
Furthermore, using Bitcoin as a benchmark for volatility-adjusted returns (Sharpe Ratio), the trend-based portfolio scored 13.1, compared to ETH’s 10.1, indicating better risk efficiency.
👉 Learn how to time your entries and exits like a pro DeFi trader.
Liquidity Mining: High Rewards, Higher Barriers
Liquidity mining showed massive potential returns—but only under ideal conditions.
With a $1,000 initial investment across four major protocols (**BAL**, **COMP**, **YFI**, **SUSHI**), optimized timing could yield up to **$48,011. However, delaying entry into YFI farming by just one day slashed returns by 64%**, dropping the final value to $17,267.
For larger investors ($10,000+), these swings were less impactful relatively—but gas costs remained a universal hurdle. Estimated Ethereum network fees for managing four positions totaled **$346**, consuming nearly a third of the smaller portfolio’s gains.
This creates a paradox:
High yields attract users → Increased on-chain activity → Higher gas fees → Small investors priced out → Reduced liquidity → Lower yields over time.
Thus, while profitable for whales with early access and deep pockets, liquidity mining becomes increasingly inefficient for retail participants.
Why Trend-Based Token Trading Wins
After evaluating all strategies through multiple lenses—returns, risk-adjusted performance, knowledge requirements, and time commitment—we conclude that actively trading governance tokens based on market trends offers the best balance for most investors.
Here’s why:
- Higher Alpha: Captures momentum from new launches and community-driven narratives.
- Lower Capital Threshold: Doesn’t require large deposits or frequent rebalancing.
- Scalable Risk: Can be adjusted via position sizing and stop-loss rules.
- Adaptability: Works across bull and bear phases with proper sentiment analysis.
Unlike degenerate gambling or hyper-technical yield farming, trend-based investing rewards informed decisions—not just speed or capital size.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is liquidity mining still profitable in 2025?
A: For large-cap investors with automated tools and low gas costs (e.g., Layer 2 solutions), yes. But for small investors, high fees and intense competition often erase gains. Success requires perfect timing and deep protocol knowledge.
Q: What are the risks of trading DeFi governance tokens?
A: Key risks include extreme volatility, smart contract vulnerabilities, regulatory uncertainty, and exposure to “pump-and-dump” schemes. Always research project fundamentals before investing.
Q: How do I start trend-based investing in DeFi?
A: Begin by following key influencers on Twitter/X, tracking token launches on platforms like Dune Analytics, and setting alerts for protocol upgrades. Use small positions initially to test your strategy.
Q: Why did YFI perform so well during this period?
A: Yearn Finance introduced innovative yield aggregation mechanics and distributed YFI tokens entirely through liquidity mining—creating scarcity and strong community ownership early on.
Q: Can I combine multiple DeFi strategies?
A: Yes. Many advanced investors use a hybrid model: hold core ETH position + allocate portion to trend trading + participate selectively in high-yield farms during low-gas periods.
Q: Are governance tokens worth holding long-term?
A: Some are—especially those tied to cash-flow-generating protocols (e.g., fee sharing). However, many lack intrinsic value post-airdrop. Evaluate each based on utility, treasury health, and governance activity.
The Hidden Cost of Yield: Gas Fees and Market Cycles
Understanding the relationship between yield and network congestion is crucial. As more users flock to DeFi:
- Demand for Ethereum block space rises.
- Gas fees spike.
- Small traders get priced out.
- Liquidity dries up → yields drop → activity slows → fees fall → cycle restarts.
This feedback loop limits the sustainability of pure yield farming for retail investors. In contrast, trend-based traders can operate efficiently even during high-fee periods by reducing trade frequency and focusing on major moves.
Final Verdict
While liquidity mining grabbed headlines in 2020 with astronomical returns, it favored those with capital, speed, and technical edge. Pure HODLing offered stability but missed explosive opportunities.
The sweet spot lies in active yet disciplined trading of governance tokens using market trends—a strategy that delivered 365% returns with manageable risk and scalable effort.
For today’s DeFi investor, success isn’t about being the fastest farmer or holding the most ETH—it’s about being the most informed.
👉 Start applying data-driven DeFi strategies with advanced tools today.