Why Coinbase Can’t Ride Circle’s IPO Wave

·

The recent buzz around Circle’s IPO has sparked renewed investor interest in the broader stablecoin and crypto ecosystem. However, many are mistakenly assuming that Coinbase stands to gain significantly from Circle’s success—after all, both companies are deeply tied to USDC. Yet, a closer look reveals a more complex reality: Coinbase is not a pure proxy for Circle or USDC, and its ability to capture meaningful upside from Circle’s public market debut is limited.

While institutional data platform Artemis notes rising investor sentiment suggesting long Coinbase and short Circle positions, Kevin Li, a fundamental analyst, warns against conflating bullishness on Circle with automatic gains for Coinbase. The truth? USDC-related revenue accounts for only a fraction of Coinbase’s total income, and even that slice is under pressure from competition, user incentives, and shifting market dynamics.

👉 Discover how crypto platforms are evolving beyond exchanges in 2025.


The Myth of Coinbase as a USDC Proxy

At first glance, Coinbase appears well-positioned to benefit from USDC’s growth. After all, it co-founded the stablecoin with Circle and integrates it deeply across its products. But the financial reality paints a different picture.

Limited Revenue Share from USDC

Under the revenue-sharing agreement:

This means Coinbase keeps just ~34% of the 60% share, equating to roughly 20% of total USDC earnings—a figure that has grown to about $1 billion annually as USDC’s market cap expands.

Yet this headline number masks the net profit. After user payouts, Coinbase’s actual stablecoin net income is closer to $171 million per quarter**, or **$684 million annually—far less than implied by surface-level analysis.

“Buying Coinbase as a play on Circle’s IPO is like investing in an airport because you expect more people to fly—it may make sense at a glance, but you’re not directly owning the airline.”

Even as USDC adoption grows—with over 8 million active addresses out of 30 million stablecoin users—the dominance of Tether (USDT) remains unshaken. USDT still controls ~75% of dollar-pegged stablecoin trading volume, especially in high-volume regions like Asia and Latin America.

Meanwhile, USDC’s recovery after the Silicon Valley Bank collapse was slow, and its adoption in Canada, Bermuda, and Puerto Rico remains weak. Tether, backed by financial heavyweight Cantor Fitzgerald (a primary U.S. Treasury dealer), appears increasingly resilient to regulatory risk—eroding one of USDC’s key selling points: compliance superiority.


Erosion of Coinbase’s Regulatory Moat

For years, Coinbase leveraged its aggressive compliance posture as a competitive moat. Its costly legal infrastructure kept it ahead during periods of regulatory uncertainty, particularly under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler.

But that advantage is fading.

With the Trump administration signaling a friendlier stance toward crypto and appointing Paul Atkins—a known industry advocate—as SEC chair—the regulatory landscape is becoming more transparent and accessible. This lowers barriers for traditional financial players like Robinhood, which now offer crypto trading with minimal friction.

The result? Robinhood’s retail crypto revenue has surged from 32% of Coinbase’s in Q4 2023 to 76% in Q4 2024. As compliance becomes table stakes rather than a differentiator, Coinbase’s once-formidable护城河 (moat) is narrowing.

👉 See how new regulations are reshaping crypto access in 2025.


Exchange Business Under Pressure

Coinbase’s core exchange business—once responsible for over 90% of its revenue—now contributes only about 55%, reflecting structural shifts in user behavior and market competition.

Declining Market Share and Fees

MetricPeakCurrent
U.S. Spot Trading Share>58%~38% (down to 32% during meme coin surge)
Retail Trading Fee2.5%~1.4%

This erosion stems from three major forces:

  1. ETF Disruption: Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs allow institutional and retail investors to gain exposure without using exchanges. BlackRock’s IBIT ETF surpassed its gold ETF’s 20-year AUM in under 12 months.
  2. DEX Competition: Decentralized exchanges like Raydium and Uniswap offer instant liquidity for new tokens—especially meme coins—without listing delays.
  3. Meme Coin Blind Spot: Coinbase’s strict compliance slows its ability to list speculative assets. It missed the Solana meme coin wave entirely, while DEXs captured explosive volume growth.

In fact, DEX-to-CEX spot trading volume has doubled this cycle, highlighting where user activity now flows.


New Growth Engines: Base and Derivatives

To offset declining exchange margins, Coinbase has diversified into new revenue streams: Base (its Ethereum L2) and derivatives trading.

Base: High Margins, Fragmentation Challenges

Launched in 2024, Base quickly became the most transacted Ethereum Layer 2, powered by apps like FriendTech and Farcaster.

Key stats:

Despite strong fundamentals, Base faces structural hurdles:

Compared to monolithic chains like Solana:

While Base leads among Ethereum L2s, it lags behind unified architectures in real-world adoption.

Derivatives: Volume Up, Profits Down

Coinbase’s derivatives platform now sees over $300 billion in monthly trading volume, driven by U.S. retail interest post-election.

However:

Though derivatives boost short-term revenue, they haven’t driven meaningful user acquisition or sustainable profitability.


Valuation: Is Coinbase Undervalued?

Using a sum-of-the-parts model:

SegmentValuation
Exchange Business$807B (based on 156x revenue multiple)
Base$18.6B (30x P/E on $618M gross profit)
USDC Stake$451.8B (60% of Circle’s $528.5B valuation × 57% retention)
Cash & Interest Income$8B
Total (80% weighting)~$1085.92B

While this suggests potential undervaluation, the market likely prices in real risks:


FAQ: Your Questions Answered

Q: Does Coinbase own Circle or USDC?
A: No. Coinbase co-created USDC with Circle but does not own the company. They share USDC revenue under a fixed agreement.

Q: Can Base overtake Solana?
A: Unlikely in the near term. Solana leads in speed, cost, and adoption. Base excels within the Ethereum ecosystem but lacks cross-chain agility.

Q: Why isn’t Coinbase benefiting from Circle’s IPO?
A: Because its revenue exposure to USDC is small (~15–20%) and heavily diluted by user payouts. Circle’s valuation reflects future payment ecosystem growth—not direct gains for Coinbase.

Q: Is Coinbase still a good investment?
A: It depends. Fundamentally, it may appear undervalued, but competitive pressures on every business line justify market caution.

Q: What’s driving Coinbase’s user growth now?
A: Primarily institutional services, staking, and Base ecosystem apps—not spot trading.

Q: Will Coinbase launch its own token?
A: Unlikely. Regulatory risk makes a native token improbable for now.

👉 Explore emerging blockchain platforms redefining value capture in 2025.


Final Thoughts: A Diversified Ecosystem Facing Full-Spectrum Competition

Coinbase has evolved from a simple exchange into a full-stack crypto ecosystem—encompassing trading, stablecoins, Layer 2 infrastructure, and institutional services. But each leg of this strategy now faces intense competition:

While the sum-of-the-parts valuation suggests upside potential, the market isn’t wrong to price in structural risks. Coinbase isn’t failing—it’s adapting—but adaptation takes time, capital, and innovation in an environment where first-mover advantages are vanishing.

If you’re bullish on Circle’s IPO, invest in Circle—not Coinbase. The two may share a stablecoin, but their economic destinies are far from aligned.